Our Three Step Process
B2B SaaS — Lead Follow-Up OS

Our Three Step Process
B2B SaaS — Lead Follow-Up OS

A B2B SaaS team had leads coming in — but no consistent follow-up system. We installed routing, lifecycle definitions, and sequenced nurture/booking logic so no lead slipped and the CRM became the single source of truth.
Client Background:
A B2B SaaS startup selling a mid-ticket subscription to operations teams. The product was strong, inbound interest existed, and the founder was investing in content + webinars + partner mentions. The problem wasn’t lead volume — it was what happened after the lead arrived.
The team was lean (founder + 1 sales rep), using a CRM inconsistently, and running on “best effort” follow-up.
Challenge:
Leads were leaking in predictable places:
Forms, webinar signups, and inbound emails all landed in different places.
There was no shared definition of what counted as MQL, SQL, or “hot.”
Follow-up relied on memory. If the founder was busy, leads went cold.
The CRM contained partial truths; the real pipeline lived in Slack threads and spreadsheets.
They couldn’t answer the most important question:
“When a lead comes in, what exactly happens next — every time?”
Solution:
We installed a Lead Follow-Up Operating System designed to make lead handling predictable, measurable, and fast.
The goal was not “more tools.”
The goal was one governed system that:
routes every lead correctly
enforces definitions (MQL/SQL)
triggers the right sequence automatically
escalates only qualified leads to a calendar
This wasn’t a “brand voice” project, but messaging clarity did matter for conversion and follow-up.
We ran a short discovery to standardise:
core ICP and buying triggers
the 3–5 strongest pain statements
the proof points used in nurture emails
the tone: calm, direct, operator-to-operator (no hype)
This ensured every follow-up message sounded like the same company — not a patchwork of founder improvisation.
Service Descriptions (what we installed)
1) Lifecycle Definitions (the language layer)
We defined and documented:
Lead → MQL → SQL → Opportunity → Customer
entry criteria for each stage
exit criteria (what moves someone forward or disqualifies them)
This prevented internal confusion and made reporting meaningful.
2) Routing & Segmentation (the sorting layer)
We built segmentation rules based on:
source (webinar / inbound / partnership / content)
role & company fit
intent signals (requested demo vs downloaded asset)
Every lead was tagged and routed into one of three lanes:
Cold (not ready, nurture)
Warm (interested, education + proof + soft CTA)
Hot (qualified, booking CTA)
3) Follow-Up Sequences (the conversion layer)
We installed 3 core sequences:
Cold Nurture (7–14 days)
Education + proof + problem framing. Designed to raise intent safely.Warm Conversion (5–10 days)
Objections, case examples, “why now,” and a clear next step.Hot Booking (1–3 days)
Speed-to-contact, short messages, and booking prompts. Calendar access only when qualified.
Each sequence had:
clear stop rules (when they book, reply, or disqualify)
escalation rules (when a human steps in)
4) CRM Hygiene + Ownership (the governance layer)
We installed:
a single pipeline view (no shadow spreadsheets)
mandatory fields for stage movement
“next action required” property so nothing stalls
a weekly operating rhythm (15 minutes) for review
5) Speed Improvements (the automation layer)
We automated the boring but critical:
instant confirmation + “what happens next” email
internal alerts for hot leads
reminders if no response within X hours
meeting booked → pipeline updated automatically
Client Testimonials and Success Stories (how we collected proof):
Instead of vague praise, we asked the client to confirm:
what felt different day-to-day
where leads used to leak
what improved immediately after install
We also captured a short “before/after” narrative for future Case Files.
Results:
Because this was an operating system install (not a long-run campaign), results were measured as operational reliability first, then conversion second.
Immediate operational outcomes:
Lead handling became standardised end-to-end (every lead routed into a defined lane).
Follow-up shifted from memory-based to system-based.
Hot leads received faster responses due to automated alerts and booking logic.
CRM became the single source of truth (replacing spreadsheet shadow-pipeline).
Short-term commercial outcomes (typical after install):
fewer leads “ghosted” due to missed follow-up
more consistent conversion from warm → booked
clearer visibility into which channels produced qualified intent
Testimonial
“Before this, we had leads coming in — but we weren’t running a system. Now every lead is routed, followed up, and tracked properly. The biggest change is consistency: we don’t lose opportunities because we’re busy.”
Founder, B2B SaaS (UK).
This case study demonstrates…
…what happens when you stop treating growth as a set of marketing tasks and start treating it as an operating system.
Tools don’t create predictability. Operating models do.
Routing + definitions + follow-up + governance is what stops revenue leakage — and makes growth measurable.
—- —- —-
Start with an OS Diagnosis
If your pipeline depends on memory, you don’t have a system. We’ll map the real journey, identify the top revenue leaks, and recommend the smallest install that makes growth predictable.
Apply for OS Diagnosis
Applications reviewed in batches. Qualified teams receive a booking link.
Client Background:
A B2B SaaS startup selling a mid-ticket subscription to operations teams. The product was strong, inbound interest existed, and the founder was investing in content + webinars + partner mentions. The problem wasn’t lead volume — it was what happened after the lead arrived.
The team was lean (founder + 1 sales rep), using a CRM inconsistently, and running on “best effort” follow-up.
Challenge:
Leads were leaking in predictable places:
Forms, webinar signups, and inbound emails all landed in different places.
There was no shared definition of what counted as MQL, SQL, or “hot.”
Follow-up relied on memory. If the founder was busy, leads went cold.
The CRM contained partial truths; the real pipeline lived in Slack threads and spreadsheets.
They couldn’t answer the most important question:
“When a lead comes in, what exactly happens next — every time?”
Solution:
We installed a Lead Follow-Up Operating System designed to make lead handling predictable, measurable, and fast.
The goal was not “more tools.”
The goal was one governed system that:
routes every lead correctly
enforces definitions (MQL/SQL)
triggers the right sequence automatically
escalates only qualified leads to a calendar
This wasn’t a “brand voice” project, but messaging clarity did matter for conversion and follow-up.
We ran a short discovery to standardise:
core ICP and buying triggers
the 3–5 strongest pain statements
the proof points used in nurture emails
the tone: calm, direct, operator-to-operator (no hype)
This ensured every follow-up message sounded like the same company — not a patchwork of founder improvisation.
Service Descriptions (what we installed)
1) Lifecycle Definitions (the language layer)
We defined and documented:
Lead → MQL → SQL → Opportunity → Customer
entry criteria for each stage
exit criteria (what moves someone forward or disqualifies them)
This prevented internal confusion and made reporting meaningful.
2) Routing & Segmentation (the sorting layer)
We built segmentation rules based on:
source (webinar / inbound / partnership / content)
role & company fit
intent signals (requested demo vs downloaded asset)
Every lead was tagged and routed into one of three lanes:
Cold (not ready, nurture)
Warm (interested, education + proof + soft CTA)
Hot (qualified, booking CTA)
3) Follow-Up Sequences (the conversion layer)
We installed 3 core sequences:
Cold Nurture (7–14 days)
Education + proof + problem framing. Designed to raise intent safely.Warm Conversion (5–10 days)
Objections, case examples, “why now,” and a clear next step.Hot Booking (1–3 days)
Speed-to-contact, short messages, and booking prompts. Calendar access only when qualified.
Each sequence had:
clear stop rules (when they book, reply, or disqualify)
escalation rules (when a human steps in)
4) CRM Hygiene + Ownership (the governance layer)
We installed:
a single pipeline view (no shadow spreadsheets)
mandatory fields for stage movement
“next action required” property so nothing stalls
a weekly operating rhythm (15 minutes) for review
5) Speed Improvements (the automation layer)
We automated the boring but critical:
instant confirmation + “what happens next” email
internal alerts for hot leads
reminders if no response within X hours
meeting booked → pipeline updated automatically
Client Testimonials and Success Stories (how we collected proof):
Instead of vague praise, we asked the client to confirm:
what felt different day-to-day
where leads used to leak
what improved immediately after install
We also captured a short “before/after” narrative for future Case Files.
Results:
Because this was an operating system install (not a long-run campaign), results were measured as operational reliability first, then conversion second.
Immediate operational outcomes:
Lead handling became standardised end-to-end (every lead routed into a defined lane).
Follow-up shifted from memory-based to system-based.
Hot leads received faster responses due to automated alerts and booking logic.
CRM became the single source of truth (replacing spreadsheet shadow-pipeline).
Short-term commercial outcomes (typical after install):
fewer leads “ghosted” due to missed follow-up
more consistent conversion from warm → booked
clearer visibility into which channels produced qualified intent
Testimonial
“Before this, we had leads coming in — but we weren’t running a system. Now every lead is routed, followed up, and tracked properly. The biggest change is consistency: we don’t lose opportunities because we’re busy.”
Founder, B2B SaaS (UK).
This case study demonstrates…
…what happens when you stop treating growth as a set of marketing tasks and start treating it as an operating system.
Tools don’t create predictability. Operating models do.
Routing + definitions + follow-up + governance is what stops revenue leakage — and makes growth measurable.
—- —- —-
Start with an OS Diagnosis
If your pipeline depends on memory, you don’t have a system. We’ll map the real journey, identify the top revenue leaks, and recommend the smallest install that makes growth predictable.
Apply for OS Diagnosis
Applications reviewed in batches. Qualified teams receive a booking link.
A B2B SaaS team had leads coming in — but no consistent follow-up system. We installed routing, lifecycle definitions, and sequenced nurture/booking logic so no lead slipped and the CRM became the single source of truth.
Client Background:
A B2B SaaS startup selling a mid-ticket subscription to operations teams. The product was strong, inbound interest existed, and the founder was investing in content + webinars + partner mentions. The problem wasn’t lead volume — it was what happened after the lead arrived.
The team was lean (founder + 1 sales rep), using a CRM inconsistently, and running on “best effort” follow-up.
Challenge:
Leads were leaking in predictable places:
Forms, webinar signups, and inbound emails all landed in different places.
There was no shared definition of what counted as MQL, SQL, or “hot.”
Follow-up relied on memory. If the founder was busy, leads went cold.
The CRM contained partial truths; the real pipeline lived in Slack threads and spreadsheets.
They couldn’t answer the most important question:
“When a lead comes in, what exactly happens next — every time?”
Solution:
We installed a Lead Follow-Up Operating System designed to make lead handling predictable, measurable, and fast.
The goal was not “more tools.”
The goal was one governed system that:
routes every lead correctly
enforces definitions (MQL/SQL)
triggers the right sequence automatically
escalates only qualified leads to a calendar
This wasn’t a “brand voice” project, but messaging clarity did matter for conversion and follow-up.
We ran a short discovery to standardise:
core ICP and buying triggers
the 3–5 strongest pain statements
the proof points used in nurture emails
the tone: calm, direct, operator-to-operator (no hype)
This ensured every follow-up message sounded like the same company — not a patchwork of founder improvisation.
Service Descriptions (what we installed)
1) Lifecycle Definitions (the language layer)
We defined and documented:
Lead → MQL → SQL → Opportunity → Customer
entry criteria for each stage
exit criteria (what moves someone forward or disqualifies them)
This prevented internal confusion and made reporting meaningful.
2) Routing & Segmentation (the sorting layer)
We built segmentation rules based on:
source (webinar / inbound / partnership / content)
role & company fit
intent signals (requested demo vs downloaded asset)
Every lead was tagged and routed into one of three lanes:
Cold (not ready, nurture)
Warm (interested, education + proof + soft CTA)
Hot (qualified, booking CTA)
3) Follow-Up Sequences (the conversion layer)
We installed 3 core sequences:
Cold Nurture (7–14 days)
Education + proof + problem framing. Designed to raise intent safely.Warm Conversion (5–10 days)
Objections, case examples, “why now,” and a clear next step.Hot Booking (1–3 days)
Speed-to-contact, short messages, and booking prompts. Calendar access only when qualified.
Each sequence had:
clear stop rules (when they book, reply, or disqualify)
escalation rules (when a human steps in)
4) CRM Hygiene + Ownership (the governance layer)
We installed:
a single pipeline view (no shadow spreadsheets)
mandatory fields for stage movement
“next action required” property so nothing stalls
a weekly operating rhythm (15 minutes) for review
5) Speed Improvements (the automation layer)
We automated the boring but critical:
instant confirmation + “what happens next” email
internal alerts for hot leads
reminders if no response within X hours
meeting booked → pipeline updated automatically
Client Testimonials and Success Stories (how we collected proof):
Instead of vague praise, we asked the client to confirm:
what felt different day-to-day
where leads used to leak
what improved immediately after install
We also captured a short “before/after” narrative for future Case Files.
Results:
Because this was an operating system install (not a long-run campaign), results were measured as operational reliability first, then conversion second.
Immediate operational outcomes:
Lead handling became standardised end-to-end (every lead routed into a defined lane).
Follow-up shifted from memory-based to system-based.
Hot leads received faster responses due to automated alerts and booking logic.
CRM became the single source of truth (replacing spreadsheet shadow-pipeline).
Short-term commercial outcomes (typical after install):
fewer leads “ghosted” due to missed follow-up
more consistent conversion from warm → booked
clearer visibility into which channels produced qualified intent
Testimonial
“Before this, we had leads coming in — but we weren’t running a system. Now every lead is routed, followed up, and tracked properly. The biggest change is consistency: we don’t lose opportunities because we’re busy.”
Founder, B2B SaaS (UK).
This case study demonstrates…
…what happens when you stop treating growth as a set of marketing tasks and start treating it as an operating system.
Tools don’t create predictability. Operating models do.
Routing + definitions + follow-up + governance is what stops revenue leakage — and makes growth measurable.
—- —- —-
Start with an OS Diagnosis
If your pipeline depends on memory, you don’t have a system. We’ll map the real journey, identify the top revenue leaks, and recommend the smallest install that makes growth predictable.
Apply for OS Diagnosis
Applications reviewed in batches. Qualified teams receive a booking link.


Other Projects
Other Case Studies
Check our other project case studies with detailed explanations
Other Projects
Other Case Studies
Check our other project case studies with detailed explanations
Other Projects
Other Case Studies
Check our other project case studies with detailed explanations


